« The business side of convergence | Main | Is Google News a news service? »

May 20, 2004

Blogs, newspapers, and link authority


The most interesting thing to come out of last night's Technorati Developers Salon -- at least from the perspective of this new media guy -- was the slide that David Sifry showed depicting the number of links back to each media site from the blogosphere.

The importance of this measurement is obvious: The higher your placement, the more authority you have in the eyes of the blogosphere, and the more you become part of the conversation.

I had hoped to obtain a copy of the slide to write about here, or for OJR, but I'm told that another magazine is planning to write about it, so I'll just relate briefly what I heard last night and post the photo I took of Dave explaining the bar chart. The list below isn't comprehensive.

High at the top of the chart are the sites with the most inbound links:

The New York Times
CNN
BBC
Washington Post

But then things start to get interesting:

Slashdot
Guardian
Plastic
Suicide Girls
Salon
BoingBoing
Instapundit
Slate
Fox
SFGate
Reuters
Drudge Report
MSNBC.com
USA Today
Talking Points Memo
Scripting News
Metafilter
Eschaton
Kos
Wil Wheaton

As Steve Gillmor of Infoworld pointed out, "Where's the Wall Street Journal? It's no surprise they're not up there."

What's shocking, in a way, is how quickly the top-tier blogs like
Instapundit and BoingBoing already have more link authority than well-established news sites like Slate, Fox, Reuters, MSNBC and USA Today. This, only two years after blogs have taken off in a big way.

Think about what the numbers will look like 10 years from now.

May 20, 2004 at 12:27 PM in New media, Weblogs | Permalink

TrackBack

TrackBack URL for this entry:
http://www.typepad.com/services/trackback/6a00d83451db1569e200e550585ab68834

Listed below are links to weblogs that reference Blogs, newspapers, and link authority:

» Thursday Blog News Roundup from Micro Persuasion
A few more items to note today... Mary Jo Foley reports that Bill Gates called blogging and the RSS Web content syndication service a "very interesting phenomenon." Key story quote: "He suggested in a speech that by using RSS as [Read More]

Tracked on May 20, 2004 2:04:40 PM

» The Wall Street what? from c h a n d r a s u t r a
Blogs are displacing mainstream media according to the results of the Technorati Developers Salon. J.D Lasica, editor of the Online [Read More]

Tracked on May 20, 2004 2:21:00 PM

» Blogging WWW2004 :
Link authority in blogosophere
from wiredpen
Link authority and reputation management are two big topics at the conference. That ties into New Media Musing's post today touching on which mainsteam news sources are most-cited by the blogosphere, according to Technorati data. And the winners are? NYT, [Read More]

Tracked on May 20, 2004 2:35:54 PM

» Thursday Blog News Roundup from Micro Persuasion
A few more items to note today... Mary Jo Foley reports that Bill Gates called blogging and the RSS Web content syndication service a "very interesting phenomenon." Key story quote: "He suggested in a speech that by using RSS as [Read More]

Tracked on May 20, 2004 4:36:35 PM

» News effect of Blog Page Rank from IrishEyes
JD -- After JD Lasica snapped a graphic of a Technorati briefing on blogs, page rank and news authority, readers started commenting on (1) who has standing and (2) titles subordinated by bloggers. Google's Page Rank algorithm permits blogs to [Read More]

Tracked on May 20, 2004 4:37:29 PM

» Link authority? from Atrium
O assunto não é novo mas ganha considerável solidez num mundo comunicacional em tão grande mudança. A hipertextualidade parece ter vindo para ficar e, por arrastamento, isso terá acrescentado uma nova dimensão à referencialidade - às ligações que cada ... [Read More]

Tracked on May 20, 2004 4:37:51 PM

» Link authority? from Atrium
O assunto não é novo mas ganha considerável solidez num mundo comunicacional em tão grande mudança. A hipertextualidade parece ter vindo para ficar e, por arrastamento, isso terá acrescentado uma nova dimensão à referencialidade - às ligações que cada ... [Read More]

Tracked on May 20, 2004 4:39:00 PM

» Link authority? from Atrium
O assunto não é novo mas ganha considerável solidez num mundo comunicacional em tão grande mudança. A hipertextualidade parece ter vindo para ficar e, por arrastamento, isso terá acrescentado uma nova dimensão à referencialidade - às ligações que cada ... [Read More]

Tracked on May 20, 2004 4:39:57 PM

» Links: quem não aparece, esquece from Atrium
O assunto não é novo mas ganha considerável solidez num mundo comunicacional em tão grande mudança. A hipertextualidade parece ter vindo para ficar e, por arrastamento, isso terá acrescentado uma nova dimensão à referencialidade - às ligações que cada ... [Read More]

Tracked on May 20, 2004 4:41:45 PM

» Links: quem não aparece, esquece from Atrium
O assunto não é novo mas ganha considerável solidez num mundo comunicacional em tão grande mudança. A hipertextualidade parece ter vindo para ficar e, por arrastamento, isso terá acrescentado uma nova dimensão à referencialidade - às ligações que cada ... [Read More]

Tracked on May 20, 2004 4:43:59 PM

» Technorati journalism from Media Culpa
Seems that there are more people than me that engage in Technorati journalism. [Read More]

Tracked on May 21, 2004 2:31:58 AM

» Zeitgeist Metric from IrishEyes
DUBLIN -- While analysts on the west coast of the US look at one way of tracking the veracity of news sources, several Irish broadsheets cover long-awaited JNIR/Monitrack statistics on Internet site traffic among Irish. The west coast analysis documents [Read More]

Tracked on May 22, 2004 12:11:24 AM

» Data on the rise of blogs from Thoughtsignals
J.D. Lasica has some interesting notes from Technorati's Developer Salon last week, including one on the sites with the most inbound links from blogs (from Steve Outing). Several bloggers rank higher than major media outlets, and the subscription-only ... [Read More]

Tracked on Oct 3, 2004 7:17:04 AM

» 传递的消息 仍来自传统媒体 from CNBlog: Blog on Blog
Keso在Blog作为一种媒体中说“况且,即使在充分个人化的blog上,彼此间传递的很多消息,仍来自传统媒体。当然,传统媒体的消息,经过bloggers的筛选和取舍,可能会体现出某些新的价值取向�... [Read More]

Tracked on Jan 28, 2005 1:18:07 AM

» 彼此间传递的消息 仍来自传统媒体 from CNBlog: Blog on Blog
Keso在Blog作为一种媒体中说“况且,即使在充分个人化的blog上,彼此间传递的很多消息,仍来自传统媒体。当然,传统媒体的消息,经过bloggers的筛选和取舍,可能会体现出某些新的价值取向�... [Read More]

Tracked on Jan 28, 2005 1:20:07 AM

Comments

As I understand it, the Wall Street Journal is a pay-site; therefore no one would link to WSJ articles because most people wouldn't be able to access them.

Posted by: Jake at May 20, 2004 2:38:22 PM

JD, if you get the slide or the graphic, please make sure you ask Kevin and David for the real one... this is missing some folks from the top 20, including CNET News.com. Technorati acknowledged the mistake separately.

This doesn't alter your overall point, but obviously I'm interested in seeing the real data.

Posted by: John Roberts at May 20, 2004 3:03:03 PM

Of the numerous tech or business journals I read on a daily basis, almost all of them carry links to the WSJ. Most of them also include the "subscription only" warning. The WSJ has restricted access and that serves to lessen the impact ("reach") it can have on the general web readership out there.

Yet from an advertising point of view, it totally qualifies and augments the value of the readership to advertisers. Can't you hear the WSJ sales pitch, "Our qualified and opt-in only readership gives you reach of X people making Y per year who live in such-and-such zip codes (surely the WSJ uses Claritas data in their selling effort) with such-and-such level of education," etc., ad nauseum. Then they contrast that with the millions of wasted click-throughs of their competitors, and can surely offer proof of spam-clicks, and so forth.

Further, a subscription-based readership can be more subject to harder clinical [primary] research data, such as time-spent-reading, return clicks, etc. This data enhances the selling process.

Of course, the WSJ could do a partial subscription and partial, or semi-free view, for upsell purposes.

FWIW, WSJ articles on subject matter of interest to me are almost always covered in other places, and with much greater pinpoint detail and substance. The WSJ offers big picture, as opposed to hard facts that might be useful. That's my take, anyway.

Posted by: Dean Landsman at May 20, 2004 4:10:48 PM

Post a comment

(Because of spam, comments are held for approval by JD)