« 'Da Vinci and the Code' | Main | Rhapsody: listen to 25 songs a month, free »

December 06, 2005

Wikipedia and citizen editing

By now you've probably heard the reports that Wikipedia will be tightening up on its rules to allow only registered members to create new articles (though any anonymous troll can still edit an article). Marc Canter and I wrestled with this early on at Ourmedia.org and decided to allow only registered users to publish media or comment on other people's media. Identity creates community; anonymity can damage it.

Dana Blankenhorn praises Wikipedia for its fast response to the John Seigenthaler character-assassination miscue. But Digital Podcast News has this: Podshow Founder Actions Lead To Questions About Wikipedia Credibility. Plus:

CNET News.com: Growing pains for Wikipedia.

Podcast News: Wikipedia Caught in Podfather Turf War.

Wikipedia: Transcript of Jimmy Wales and John Seigenthaler on CNN.

News.com's executive editor: Perspective: Wikipedia and the nature of truth.

Steve Rubel at WebProNews: Wikipedia is the next Google.

eGov Monitor: Wikipedia: the dawn of democratic media?

Editor and Publisher: The danger of Wikipedia.

Mail & Guardian: Can you trust Wikipedia?

News.com: How much do you trust Wikipedia?

How much do I trust Wikipedia? A lot -- though not completely, and not to the exclusion of other news and information sources. But what source would you trust completely?

December 6, 2005 at 10:46 PM in Citizen media | Permalink

TrackBack

TrackBack URL for this entry:
http://www.typepad.com/t/trackback/5767/3808130

Listed below are links to weblogs that reference Wikipedia and citizen editing:

» Om online-anonymitet from MidtImod.dk - Mens vi venter
I en kommentar til den igangværende Wikipedia-debat (for de uindviede: en journalist ved navn John Seigenthaler er i en Wikipedia artikel blevet hængt ud som værende involveret i mordene på såvel John F. som Robert Kennedy), skriver New Media Musings: "B [Read More]

Tracked on Dec 8, 2005 2:57:55 AM

Comments

Post a comment

(Because of spam, comments are held for approval by JD)